PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZZ vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMZZ vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMZZ vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
-22.23%-8.94%38.36%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-10.70%15.02%11.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a -22.23% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -10.70% return.


AMZZ

1D
7.15%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-22.23%
6M
-18.42%
1Y
-3.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.98%
YTD
-10.70%
6M
-11.02%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMZZ vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMZZ vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ
AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZZ vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZZIFEDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

0.29

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.47

0.52

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

0.39

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.23

1.24

-1.47

AMZZ vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZZ and IFED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZZIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.29

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.58

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and IFED is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMZZ vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZZ nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and IFED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZZIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-22.36%

-32.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.97%

-14.65%

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.16%

-12.52%

-28.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-5.70%

-15.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.47%

4.64%

+13.83%

Volatility

AMZZ vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) has a higher volatility of 18.27% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.91%. This indicates that AMZZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMZZIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.27%

4.91%

+13.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.76%

10.83%

+33.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.49%

18.80%

+50.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.25%

19.72%

+43.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.25%

19.72%

+43.53%