PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZY vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZY vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMZY having a 3.56% return and XAPR slightly lower at 3.39%.


AMZY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZY vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and XAPR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.56

The correlation between AMZY and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZY vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZY vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZYXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.06

-0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

13.37

-12.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

70.60

-68.79

AMZY vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZYXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

4.31

-3.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.88

-0.94

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZYXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-6.18%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-0.66%

-18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.16%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-0.18%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

0.12%

+7.76%

Volatility

AMZY vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that AMZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZYXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

0.75%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

1.31%

+14.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

2.05%

+21.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

6.18%

+18.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

6.18%

+18.88%

AMZY vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZY vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%, while XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
57.72%52.59%47.91%9.90%
XAPR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZY and XAPR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 14.23% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, XAPR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAPR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZY and 0.85% for XAPR.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZY and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer