PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZY vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZY vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.32% return.


AMZY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZY vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
3.56%10.39%13.91%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
3.32%5.81%4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and LAPR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZY vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZY vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZYLAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-11.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.93

-1.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

29.36

-28.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

144.96

-143.15

AMZY vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZYLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

5.58

-4.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.97

-1.03

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZYLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-3.81%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-0.24%

-19.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.12%

-7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-0.11%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

0.05%

+7.83%

Volatility

AMZY vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that AMZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZYLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

0.32%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

1.00%

+15.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

1.27%

+22.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

3.30%

+21.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

3.30%

+21.76%

AMZY vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZY vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%, more than LAPR's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
57.72%52.59%47.91%9.90%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
5.53%5.40%4.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZY and LAPR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 14.23% vs 7.01% for LAPR. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 5.53% for LAPR.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZY and 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZY and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer