PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZY vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZY vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 4.28% return.


AMZY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.94%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZY vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
3.56%10.39%35.28%18.31%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
4.28%23.23%-3.96%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZY and ISWN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZY vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZY vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZYISWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.38

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

4.67

-2.86

AMZY vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZY and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZYISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.09

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.01

+0.93

Drawdowns

AMZY vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZY drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZY and ISWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZYISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-32.35%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-9.63%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-4.03%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-16.17%

+10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

2.85%

+5.03%

Volatility

AMZY vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) at 4.67%. This indicates that AMZY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZYISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

4.67%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

10.10%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

12.20%

+11.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

11.67%

+13.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

11.57%

+13.49%

AMZY vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZY vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%, more than ISWN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
57.72%52.59%47.91%9.90%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.82%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZY and ISWN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to ISWN (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZY dropped -23.70% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 14.23% vs 13.27% for ISWN. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ISWN has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 13.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 2.82% for ISWN.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZY and 0.49% for ISWN.

ISWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZY and ISWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer