AMZW vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. AMZW is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

AMZW vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 5.03% return.

AMZW

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -9.25%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	9.45%	7.33%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	5.03%	11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and PBP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.48

AMZW vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZW	PBP
Consumer Cyclical	24.9%	10.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.7%
Energy	-	3.3%
Financial Services	-	11.4%
Healthcare	-	8.6%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.5%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 83
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZW	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.35	+0.15

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-43.43%	+16.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.22%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.87%	-0.04%	-9.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-6.69%	-2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.95%	6.87%	+30.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.95%	11.86%	+25.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.95%	13.66%	+23.29%

AMZW vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.29%, more than PBP's 11.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	42.29%	25.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.14%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and PBP in my portfolio?

AMZW and PBP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or PBP?

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or PBP?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 42.29%, compared with 11.14% for PBP.

What is the main difference between AMZW and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.29% for PBP.