AMZW vs. NVDW
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 3.13% vs 26.14% for NVDW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZW vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -4.59% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 3.26% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- -17.54%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -10.84%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | -4.59% | 7.33% |
NVDW Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 3.26% | 32.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and NVDW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
NVDW
AMZW vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 1.03 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 2.35 | -2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -25.54% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -25.54% | -1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.43% | -20.44% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -8.59% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.95% | 11.15% | +0.80% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 12.51%, while Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.11%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.51% | 15.11% | -2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.48% | 31.81% | -5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 42.48% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 41.92% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 41.92% | -4.52% |
AMZW vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZW and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMZW vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.15%, less than NVDW's 65.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 51.15% | 25.29% |
NVDW Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 65.71% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and NVDW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to AMZW (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs NVDW's -25.54%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 26.14% vs 3.13% for AMZW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 26.14% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZW and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 65.71%, compared with 51.15% for AMZW.
NVDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer