AMZW vs. AMZU
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%). AMZW is actively managed, while AMZU is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for AMZU.
Performance
AMZW vs. AMZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMZU's 8.04% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- -16.62%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 21.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. AMZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 7.52% | 7.33% |
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 8.04% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and AMZU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.99 |
AMZW vs. AMZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
AMZU
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
AMZU
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Energy
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Technology
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Utilities
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. AMZU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
AMZU
AMZW vs. AMZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. AMZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum AMZU drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and AMZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -55.59% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -20.42% | +8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -21.91% | +13.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.91% | — |
Volatility
AMZW vs. AMZU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 59.79% | -22.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 59.16% | -22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 59.16% | -22.17% |
AMZW vs. AMZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. AMZU - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than AMZU's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.62% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 43.04% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMZW and AMZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 5.62% for AMZU.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.06% for AMZU.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and AMZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer