AMZW vs. AMZU
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%). AMZW is actively managed, while AMZU is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 6.63% vs -0.96% for AMZU. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for AMZU.
Performance
AMZW vs. AMZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than AMZU's -6.45% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -24.03%
- YTD
- -6.45%
- 6M
- -7.98%
- 1Y
- -0.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. AMZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | -0.73% | 7.33% |
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | -6.45% | 3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and AMZU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.99 |
The correlation between AMZW and AMZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZW vs. AMZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
AMZU
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
AMZU
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Energy
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Technology
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Utilities
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. AMZU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
AMZU
AMZW vs. AMZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.02 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | -0.05 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. AMZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum AMZU drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and AMZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -55.59% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -42.98% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.25% | -31.10% | +12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -21.95% | +12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.87% | 19.75% | -7.88% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. AMZU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 12.09%, while Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 20.58% | -8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.19% | 43.46% | -17.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.44% | 61.58% | -24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 59.38% | -22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 59.38% | -22.11% |
AMZW vs. AMZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. AMZU - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, more than AMZU's 6.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 6.24% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 49.16% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMZW and AMZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AMZU has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to AMZW (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs AMZU's -55.59%.
On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 6.63% vs -0.96% for AMZU. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 12.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 6.63% return vs -0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 49.16%, compared with 6.24% for AMZU.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.06% for AMZU.
AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and AMZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer