AMZW vs. AMZU
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (200%). AMZW is actively managed, while AMZU is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 8.93% vs 2.10% for AMZU. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZW vs. AMZU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than AMZU's 5.12% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU
- 1D
- -3.94%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. AMZU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 7.08% | 7.33% |
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.12% | 3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and AMZU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.99 |
The correlation between AMZW and AMZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZW vs. AMZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZW
AMZU
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZW
AMZU
Basic Materials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Communication Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Energy
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Financial Services
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Healthcare
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Industrials
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Real Estate
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Technology
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Utilities
AMZW
-
AMZU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. AMZU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
AMZU
AMZW vs. AMZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 0.05 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.72 | 0.10 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. AMZU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum AMZU drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and AMZU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -55.59% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.79% | -42.98% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.82% | -22.57% | +10.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -22.02% | +12.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 20.65% | -8.24% |
Volatility
AMZW vs. AMZU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 11.54%, while Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a volatility of 19.90%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | AMZU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 19.90% | -8.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.54% | 44.22% | -17.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.79% | 62.23% | -24.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.08% | 59.35% | -22.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.08% | 59.35% | -22.27% |
AMZW vs. AMZU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZW and AMZU have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMZW vs. AMZU - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.90%, more than AMZU's 5.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.55% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 45.90% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMZW and AMZU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AMZU has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to AMZW (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs AMZU's -55.59%.
On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 8.93% vs 2.10% for AMZU. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 11.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 8.93% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZW and AMZU have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 45.90%, compared with 5.55% for AMZU.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion.
AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and AMZU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer