AMZW vs. AMZD
AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). AMZW is actively managed, while AMZD is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for AMZD.
Performance
AMZW vs. AMZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD's -8.90% return.
AMZW
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW vs. AMZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 7.52% | 7.33% |
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -8.90% | -9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZW and AMZD is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZW vs. AMZD — Risk / Return Rank
AMZW
AMZD
AMZW vs. AMZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZW | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.59 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
AMZW vs. AMZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum AMZD drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and AMZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZW | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.79% | -73.05% | +46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -59.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -70.36% | +58.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -49.11% | +40.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.24% | — |
Volatility
AMZW vs. AMZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZW | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.99% | 30.15% | +6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 33.41% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 33.41% | +3.58% |
AMZW vs. AMZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZW vs. AMZD - Dividend Comparison
AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than AMZD's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 43.04% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZW and AMZD have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 3.44% for AMZD.
AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.09% for AMZD.
Find the right allocation for AMZW and AMZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer