PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -25.49% return.


AMZU

1D
-5.04%
1M
-16.62%
YTD
8.04%
6M
5.52%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
10Y*

SPXS

1D
2.19%
1M
-13.11%
YTD
-25.49%
6M
-24.86%
1Y
-48.73%
3Y*
-42.68%
5Y*
-34.76%
10Y*
-42.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
8.04%-11.59%60.99%118.70%-50.17%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-25.49%-41.53%-42.84%-45.97%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and SPXS is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

-0.66

The correlation between AMZU and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZUSPXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.75

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.96

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

-1.62

+2.76

AMZU vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZUSPXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

-1.38

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.83

+1.09

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUSPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-100.00%

+44.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-50.77%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

-84.13%

+28.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.42%

-100.00%

+79.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-96.30%

+74.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.91%

30.04%

-11.13%

Volatility

AMZU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.51%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUSPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.41%

8.51%

+5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

26.82%

+13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.79%

35.54%

+24.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.16%

50.39%

+8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.16%

53.54%

+5.62%

AMZU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than SPXS's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
5.62%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.91%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZU has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, AMZU leads with 25.11% vs -42.68% for SPXS. On fees, AMZU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AMZU has performed better with a 25.11% return vs -42.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 4.91% for SPXS.

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AMZU and 1.08% for SPXS.

AMZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer