PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


AMZU

1D
1.62%
1M
5.63%
6M
-8.93%
YTD
3.21%
1Y
-1.46%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
3.21%-11.59%26.74%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and SBIT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZUSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.25

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.60

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

5.92

-5.99

AMZU vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-91.35%

+35.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-47.94%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.98%

-77.15%

+53.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-68.83%

+46.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.53%

21.04%

-0.51%

Volatility

AMZU vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) is 19.94%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that AMZU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.94%

22.98%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.78%

68.89%

-25.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.95%

88.51%

-26.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.33%

96.89%

-37.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.33%

96.89%

-37.56%

AMZU vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZU has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZU vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
5.65%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZU and SBIT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to AMZU (19.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs -1.46% for AMZU. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 19.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs -1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZU.

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (200%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZU and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer