PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZU vs. AMZW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZU vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's 5.86% return.


AMZU

1D
1.62%
1M
5.63%
6M
-8.93%
YTD
3.21%
1Y
-1.46%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
10Y*

AMZW

1D
0.99%
1M
4.22%
6M
-2.17%
YTD
5.86%
1Y
6.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZU vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
3.21%3.72%
AMZW
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
5.86%7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZU and AMZW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.99

The correlation between AMZU and AMZW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZU vs. AMZW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMZU
AMZW

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
22.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMZU
100.0%
AMZW
22.2%

Basic Materials

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Communication Services

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Consumer Defensive

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Energy

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Financial Services

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Healthcare

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Industrials

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Real Estate

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Technology

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Utilities

AMZU

-

AMZW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZU vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZW
AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZU vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZUAMZWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.06

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

0.25

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

0.53

-0.60

AMZU vs. AMZW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZU Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the AMZW Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZU and AMZW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZU vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than AMZW's maximum drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and AMZW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZUAMZWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.59%

-26.79%

-28.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.98%

-26.79%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.98%

-12.82%

-11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.02%

-9.47%

-12.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.53%

12.35%

+8.18%

Volatility

AMZU vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 19.94% compared to Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) at 11.56%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZUAMZWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.94%

11.56%

+8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.78%

26.29%

+17.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.95%

37.63%

+24.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.33%

37.06%

+22.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.33%

37.06%

+22.27%

AMZU vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZU and AMZW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

AMZU vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison

AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than AMZW's 47.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares
5.65%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%
AMZW
Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
47.41%25.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, AMZU and AMZW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMZU has higher volatility (19.94%) compared to AMZW (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs AMZW's -26.79%.

On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 6.58% vs -1.46% for AMZU. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 6.58% return vs -1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZU and AMZW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 47.41%, compared with 5.65% for AMZU.

AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMZW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Roundhill.

AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZU and AMZW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer