AMZU vs. AMZW
AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) and AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (200%), while AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. AMZU is passively managed, while AMZW is actively managed. Over the past year, AMZU returned -1.46% vs 6.58% for AMZW. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZU vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZU achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's 5.86% return.
AMZU
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- -1.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- 6M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZU vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 3.21% | 3.72% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 5.86% | 7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZU and AMZW is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.99 |
The correlation between AMZU and AMZW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMZU vs. AMZW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZU
AMZW
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZU
AMZW
Basic Materials
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Communication Services
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Energy
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Financial Services
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Healthcare
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Industrials
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Real Estate
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Technology
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Utilities
AMZU
-
AMZW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZU vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank
AMZU
AMZW
AMZU vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZU | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 0.25 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 0.53 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZU vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZU drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than AMZW's maximum drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZU and AMZW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZU | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.59% | -26.79% | -28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.98% | -26.79% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.98% | -12.82% | -11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.02% | -9.47% | -12.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.53% | 12.35% | +8.18% |
Volatility
AMZU vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) has a higher volatility of 19.94% compared to Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) at 11.56%. This indicates that AMZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZU | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.94% | 11.56% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.78% | 26.29% | +17.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.95% | 37.63% | +24.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.33% | 37.06% | +22.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.33% | 37.06% | +22.27% |
AMZU vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZU and AMZW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMZU vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison
AMZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than AMZW's 47.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZU Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares | 5.65% | 6.12% | 3.79% | 3.37% | 0.50% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 47.41% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMZU and AMZW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AMZU has higher volatility (19.94%) compared to AMZW (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZU dropped -55.59% vs AMZW's -26.79%.
On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 6.58% vs -1.46% for AMZU. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 6.58% return vs -1.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZU and AMZW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 47.41%, compared with 5.65% for AMZU.
AMZU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMZW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Roundhill.
AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZU and AMZW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer