PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZP vs. HEQT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZP vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 4.02% return.


AMZP

1D
0.48%
1M
-13.35%
YTD
-2.19%
6M
-2.18%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQT

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
4.02%
6M
3.76%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
-2.19%9.56%37.42%7.73%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.02%10.08%18.30%6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and HEQT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

0.61

The correlation between AMZP and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZP vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZPHEQTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.40

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.56

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

11.59

-10.38

AMZP vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and HEQT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZPHEQTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-11.51%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-5.09%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.53%

-1.12%

-15.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-2.77%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

1.12%

+8.55%

Volatility

AMZP vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 2.06%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZPHEQTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

2.06%

+8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.61%

5.49%

+18.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

6.64%

+23.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.14%

8.47%

+18.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.14%

8.47%

+18.67%

AMZP vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZP vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than HEQT's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
20.90%22.04%15.15%2.45%0.00%0.00%
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.20%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZP and HEQT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to HEQT (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 13.00% vs 11.65% for AMZP. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 13.00% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 1.20% for HEQT.

AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while HEQT is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.43% for HEQT.

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZP and HEQT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer