AMZP vs. GOOP
AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while GOOP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZP returned 11.65% vs 89.88% for GOOP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZP vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 8.31% return.
AMZP
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -13.35%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOP
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 89.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZP vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | -2.19% | 9.56% | 37.42% | 7.73% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 8.31% | 52.46% | 27.67% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZP and GOOP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between AMZP and GOOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZP vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank
AMZP
GOOP
AMZP vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZP | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.53 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 3.87 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 13.74 | -12.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZP vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and GOOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZP | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -27.49% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | -23.32% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.53% | -15.08% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -6.37% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 6.56% | +3.11% |
Volatility
AMZP vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) have volatilities of 10.66% and 10.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZP | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 10.37% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.61% | 23.44% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.20% | 28.90% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 26.18% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 26.18% | +0.96% |
AMZP vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZP and GOOP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMZP vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison
AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than GOOP's 13.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 20.90% | 22.04% | 15.15% | 2.45% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 13.10% | 11.79% | 13.73% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZP and GOOP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to GOOP (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs GOOP's -27.49%.
On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 89.88% vs 11.65% for AMZP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 89.88% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZP and GOOP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 13.10% for GOOP.
AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while GOOP is Derivative Income.
GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZP and GOOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer