PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZP vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZP vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 8.31% return.


AMZP

1D
0.48%
1M
-13.35%
YTD
-2.19%
6M
-2.18%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
-1.05%
1M
-10.52%
YTD
8.31%
6M
8.42%
1Y
89.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
-2.19%9.56%37.42%7.73%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
8.31%52.46%27.67%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and GOOP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

0.57

The correlation between AMZP and GOOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZP vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZPGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.53

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.87

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

13.74

-12.53

AMZP vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZPGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-27.49%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-23.32%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.53%

-15.08%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-6.37%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

6.56%

+3.11%

Volatility

AMZP vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) have volatilities of 10.66% and 10.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZPGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

10.37%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.61%

23.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

28.90%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.14%

26.18%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.14%

26.18%

+0.96%

AMZP vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZP and GOOP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

AMZP vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than GOOP's 13.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
20.90%22.04%15.15%2.45%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.10%11.79%13.73%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZP and GOOP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to GOOP (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 89.88% vs 11.65% for AMZP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 89.88% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZP and GOOP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 13.10% for GOOP.

AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while GOOP is Derivative Income.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZP and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer