AMZP vs. AMZD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). AMZP is actively managed, while AMZD is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZP returned 11.38% vs -13.56% for AMZD. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for AMZD.

Performance

AMZP vs. AMZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD's -9.22% return.

AMZP

• 1D: -2.32%
• 1M: 1.33%
• 6M: 3.61%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZD

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -1.86%
• 6M: -6.33%
• YTD: -9.22%
• 1Y: -13.56%
• 3Y*: -20.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. AMZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	4.51%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	-9.22%	-9.84%	-30.80%	-8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and AMZD is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	-0.98

The correlation between AMZP and AMZD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMZP vs. AMZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 16
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 16
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

AMZD

AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 5
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. AMZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZP	AMZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	-0.44	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	-0.43	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.95	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	-0.48	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	-1.01	+2.12

AMZP vs. AMZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the AMZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and AMZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. AMZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum AMZD drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and AMZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZP	AMZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-73.05%	+45.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.64%	-28.27%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-59.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.82%	-70.46%	+59.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-49.67%	+43.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.26%	13.45%	-3.19%

Volatility

AMZP vs. AMZD - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) at 9.79%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZP	AMZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.29%	9.79%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.24%	22.10%	+2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.59%	31.28%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.19%	33.38%	-6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.19%	33.38%	-6.19%

AMZP vs. AMZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZP vs. AMZD - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.45%, more than AMZD's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	3.41%	3.61%	5.15%	6.83%	2.45%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	19.45%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZP and AMZD in my portfolio?

AMZP and AMZD have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZP or AMZD?

AMZP has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to AMZD (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs AMZD's -73.05%.

Which ETF is better, AMZP or AMZD?

On 1-year performance, AMZP leads with 11.38% vs -13.56% for AMZD. On fees, AMZP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZP or AMZD?

Over the 1-year period, AMZP has performed better with a 11.38% return vs -13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZP or AMZD?

AMZP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZP or AMZD?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.45%, compared with 3.41% for AMZD.

What is the main difference between AMZP and AMZD?

AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while AMZD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 1.09% for AMZD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.