PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. MINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZN vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 20.83%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-1.23%
1M
-9.69%
YTD
3.35%
6M
5.46%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
20.83%

MINT

1D
0.04%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.35%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
1.94%4.74%5.94%6.26%-1.01%-0.03%1.62%3.34%1.72%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and MINT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

-0.01

The correlation between AMZN and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT
MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNMINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-66.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

21.62

-20.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

95.35

-94.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

965.15

-963.86

AMZN vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and MINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNMINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-4.62%

-89.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-0.05%

-21.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-0.16%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-2.42%

-53.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-4.62%

-51.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.25%

0.00%

-13.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-0.17%

-28.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

0.00%

+9.21%

Volatility

AMZN vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNMINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

0.09%

+7.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

0.20%

+20.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

0.27%

+29.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

0.58%

+34.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

0.95%

+31.53%

Dividends

AMZN vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
4.28%4.63%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and MINT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZN has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs MINT's -4.62%.

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and MINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer