PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN.TO vs. BABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMZN.TO) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMZN.TO is traded in CAD, while BABA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BABA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN.TO achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -9.98% return.


AMZN.TO

1D
-2.77%
1M
-8.08%
YTD
7.31%
6M
6.48%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BABA

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
-9.98%
6M
-17.90%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
-6.33%
10Y*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMZN.TO
Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged)
7.31%-4.32%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
-12.11%44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN.TO and BABA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.22

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN.TO vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN.TO
AMZN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMZN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
BABA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMZN.TO) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZN.TOBABADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.39

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

0.96

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.45

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.01

0.87

+1.14

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN.TO and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZN.TOBABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.39

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.13

-0.07

Drawdowns

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.30%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -79.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.TO and BABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZN.TOBABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.30%

-79.43%

+49.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-37.15%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-54.41%

+45.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-35.33%

+24.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

19.34%

-10.04%

Volatility

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMZN.TO) is 7.41%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 14.47%. This indicates that AMZN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZN.TOBABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

14.47%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

28.32%

-8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.36%

43.24%

-13.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.28%

49.85%

-16.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.28%

42.00%

-8.72%

Dividends

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

AMZN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZN.TO
Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
1.57%1.36%1.96%1.29%

Financials

AMZN.TO vs. BABA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
35.15B
(AMZN.TO) Total Revenue
(BABA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AMZN.TO values in CAD, BABA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN.TO and BABA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN.TO and BABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer