AMZD vs. QQQD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMZD returned -11.96% vs -12.65% for QQQD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.

Performance

AMZD vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 5.92% return.

AMZD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 13.09%
• YTD: -3.18%
• 6M: -2.41%
• 1Y: -11.96%
• 3Y*: -20.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQD

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 10.75%
• YTD: 5.92%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: -12.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZD vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	-3.18%	-9.84%	-20.87%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	5.92%	-20.32%	-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZD and QQQD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.73

The correlation between AMZD and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMZD vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZD

AMZD Risk / Return Rank: 6
AMZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
AMZD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QQQD

QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 5
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZD vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZD	QQQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	-0.61	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	-0.78	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.91	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	-0.56	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	-0.89	-0.05

AMZD vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZD and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZD vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and QQQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZD	QQQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-49.47%	-23.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-22.72%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.50%	-42.73%	-25.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.35%	-30.65%	-18.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.77%	14.48%	-1.71%

Volatility

AMZD vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.24%. This indicates that AMZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZD	QQQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	7.24%	+2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.76%	15.69%	+6.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.01%	20.86%	+10.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.45%	26.85%	+6.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.45%	26.85%	+6.60%

AMZD vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZD vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than QQQD's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares	3.20%	3.61%	5.15%	6.83%	2.45%
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares	2.90%	4.33%	5.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZD and QQQD in my portfolio?

AMZD and QQQD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZD or QQQD?

AMZD has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to QQQD (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

Which ETF is better, AMZD or QQQD?

On 1-year performance, AMZD leads with -11.96% vs -12.65% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZD or QQQD?

Over the 1-year period, AMZD has performed better with a -11.96% return vs -12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZD or QQQD?

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZD or QQQD?

AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.90% for QQQD.

What is the main difference between AMZD and QQQD?

AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.57% for QQQD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.