AMZD vs. NVDU
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. AMZD is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD returned -25.04% vs 5.47% for NVDU. Their -0.46 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.
Performance
AMZD vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -18.67% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 0.62% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- -15.20%
- 1M
- -13.01%
- 6M
- -15.74%
- YTD
- -18.67%
- 1Y
- -25.04%
- 3Y*
- -24.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.25%
NVDU
- 1D
- 5.78%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- 6M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 84.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $135.48M | $132.64M | $131.29M | |
| $38.96M | $45.67M | $64.93M |
AMZD vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -18.67% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -7.28% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 0.62% | 33.65% | 289.29% | 12.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and NVDU is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | -0.46 |
The correlation between AMZD and NVDU shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (all time) to -0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
NVDU
AMZD vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.06 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 0.01 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 0.02 | -1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.54%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and NVDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.54% | -67.27% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -42.27% | +12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.54% | -31.47% | -42.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.89% | -19.33% | -30.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.01% | 21.69% | -7.68% |
Volatility
AMZD vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) is 18.51%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.22%. This indicates that AMZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.51% | 24.22% | -5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.88% | 56.16% | -28.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.31% | 72.37% | -37.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.25% | 90.52% | -56.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.25% | 90.52% | -56.27% |
AMZD vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than NVDU's 5.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.81% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 5.87% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and NVDU have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDU has higher volatility (24.22%) compared to AMZD (18.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.54% vs NVDU's -67.27%.
On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 5.47% vs -25.04% for AMZD. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 18.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 5.47% return vs -25.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 3.81% for AMZD.
AMZD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 1.04% for NVDU.
NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and NVDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer