AMZD vs. NVDU
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. AMZD is passively managed, while NVDU is actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD returned -19.87% vs 84.73% for NVDU. At a correlation of -0.47, they often move in opposite directions. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for NVDU.
Performance
AMZD vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -8.90% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 19.93% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDU
- 1D
- -7.30%
- 1M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 6M
- 27.09%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -8.90% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -4.81% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 19.93% | 33.65% | 289.29% | 9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and NVDU is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | -0.47 |
The correlation between AMZD and NVDU shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (all time) to -0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
NVDU
AMZD vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.02 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 4.60 | -6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 1.26 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 1.14 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and NVDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -67.27% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -42.27% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -18.32% | -52.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.11% | -18.84% | -30.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.24% | 18.47% | -5.23% |
Volatility
AMZD vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) is 7.23%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 24.74%. This indicates that AMZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | NVDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 24.74% | -17.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.49% | 50.50% | -30.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.15% | 68.02% | -37.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.41% | 91.06% | -57.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.41% | 91.06% | -57.65% |
AMZD vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than NVDU's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF | 4.83% | 5.68% | 16.85% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and NVDU have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDU has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to AMZD (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs NVDU's -67.27%.
On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 84.73% vs -19.87% for AMZD. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 84.73% return vs -19.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.44% for AMZD.
AMZD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 1.04% for NVDU.
NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and NVDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer