AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L
AMZD.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP) and NVDD.L (IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD.L returned 5.34% vs 37.04% for NVDD.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD.L achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than NVDD.L's 2.34% return.
AMZD.L
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDD.L
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 37.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | -4.23% | -2.75% | 23.09% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 2.34% | 19.76% | 14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD.L and NVDD.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD.L
NVDD.L
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.22 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.42 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 5.23 | -4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.25 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.43 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.73%, smaller than the maximum NVDD.L drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD.L and NVDD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -34.80% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.42% | -15.24% | -13.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -10.12% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -8.61% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 7.06% | +6.10% |
Volatility
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) is 8.39%, while IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that AMZD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD.L | NVDD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 10.14% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 19.56% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.01% | 29.51% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 37.19% | -8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 37.19% | -8.94% |
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZD.L and NVDD.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
AMZD.L vs. NVDD.L - Dividend Comparison
AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.80%, less than NVDD.L's 35.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | 15.80% | 14.03% | 2.37% |
NVDD.L IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP | 35.08% | 44.17% | 13.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD.L and NVDD.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZD.L and NVDD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for AMZD.L and NVDD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer