AMYY vs. STPZ
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). AMYY is actively managed, while STPZ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.
Performance
AMYY vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 1.01% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STPZ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
AMYY vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 6.64% | 19.93% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.01% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and STPZ is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STPZ
AMYY vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMYY | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and STPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -6.77% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.87% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -1.30% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.32% | 1.95% | +23.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 3.29% | +22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 2.99% | +22.33% |
AMYY vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.96%, more than STPZ's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 90.96% | 30.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.14% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and STPZ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.
AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 90.96%, compared with 4.14% for STPZ.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.20% for STPZ.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and STPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer