AMYY vs. OILK
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. AMYY is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
AMYY vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AMYY vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 7.93% | 20.39% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and OILK is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
OILK
AMYY vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMYY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 0.12 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -83.76% | +66.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.66% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -32.61% | +27.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.56% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.74% | 28.75% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 30.12% | -4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 35.97% | -10.23% |
AMYY vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.55%, more than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 81.55% | 30.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and OILK have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.
AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 81.55%, compared with 8.18% for OILK.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.68% for OILK.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer