AMYY vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

AMYY vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.

AMYY

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 9.36%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMYY vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF	7.93%	20.39%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.82%	0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AMYY and CAOS is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

AMYY vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 40
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMYY vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMYY	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	1.21	+0.53

Drawdowns

AMYY vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMYY	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.91%	-3.60%	-13.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.07%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.51%	-0.90%	-4.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMYY	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	1.52%	+24.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.74%	4.26%	+21.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.74%	4.26%	+21.48%

AMYY vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMYY vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.55%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF	81.55%	30.28%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMYY and CAOS in my portfolio?

AMYY and CAOS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMYY or CAOS?

On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMYY or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMYY or CAOS?

AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 81.55%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

What is the main difference between AMYY and CAOS?

AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.63% for CAOS.