PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUU vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUU vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 390.11% return, which is significantly higher than RTXG's -8.90% return.


AMUU

1D
5.57%
1M
31.43%
YTD
390.11%
6M
385.03%
1Y
984.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
-4.49%
1M
3.75%
YTD
-8.90%
6M
-11.14%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
390.11%167.54%
RTXG
Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF
-8.90%60.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and RTXG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUU vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMUURTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.15

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.67

0.82

+16.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.34

2.07

+32.27

AMUU vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 7.43, which is higher than the RTXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and RTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUURTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-37.49%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-37.49%

-18.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-30.36%

+29.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-9.57%

-12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.92%

14.90%

+14.02%

Volatility

AMUU vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 46.38% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 18.26%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUURTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.38%

18.26%

+28.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.29%

38.42%

+62.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.26%

49.86%

+84.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.29%

50.06%

+83.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.29%

50.06%

+83.23%

AMUU vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUU vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than RTXG's 6.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMUU and RTXG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMUU has higher volatility (46.38%) compared to RTXG (18.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs RTXG's -37.49%.

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 984.73% vs 30.73% for RTXG. On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 18.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 984.73% return vs 30.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 2.85% for AMUU.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 0.75% for RTXG.

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.43 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUU and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer