AMUU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMUU returned 984.73% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMUU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

AMUU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 390.11% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.

AMUU

• 1D: 5.57%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 390.11%
• 6M: 385.03%
• 1Y: 984.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	390.11%	145.24%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	871.59%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and INTW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.47

AMUU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMUU	INTW
Technology	100.0%	66.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 96

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMUU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.43	15.45	-8.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.31	5.37	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.68	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.67	46.81	-29.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.34	106.28	-71.94

AMUU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 7.43, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, smaller than the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-60.58%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	-49.34%	-6.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	0.00%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.50%	-29.71%	+7.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.92%	21.69%	+7.23%

Volatility

AMUU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) is 46.38%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that AMUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.38%	53.88%	-7.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.29%	118.13%	-16.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	134.26%	149.77%	-15.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.29%	148.63%	-15.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	133.29%	148.63%	-15.34%

AMUU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	2.85%	13.58%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUU and INTW in my portfolio?

AMUU and INTW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMUU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to AMUU (46.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, AMUU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs 984.73% for AMUU. On fees, AMUU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, AMUU has been the lower-risk option at 46.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMUU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs 984.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUU or INTW?

AMUU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUU or INTW?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between AMUU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs 7.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.