PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUN vs. ZTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZTAX's 0.20% return.


AMUN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZTAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
0.20%
6M
5.42%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMUN and ZTAX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUN vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUN

ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMUNZTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.05

0.20

+1.85

Drawdowns

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and ZTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUNZTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-15.33%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-6.58%

+6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-6.81%

+6.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

Volatility

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUNZTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01%

26.32%

-25.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.01%

26.84%

-25.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.01%

26.84%

-25.83%

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUN vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison

AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than ZTAX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMUN
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF
1.89%0.66%0.00%0.00%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.56%4.58%4.55%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMUN and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.

ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 1.89% for AMUN.

They also come from different issuers: abrdn and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 1.14% for ZTAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUN and ZTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer