AMUN vs. SCMB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB).

AMUN and SCMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMUN is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Oct 20, 2025. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022.

Performance

AMUN vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMUN vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	0.54%	0.14%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	-0.51%	0.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's -0.51% return.

AMUN

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 2.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUN vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

AMUN

abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF

SCMB

Schwab Municipal Bond ETF

Return for Risk

AMUN vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 49
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUN vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMUN	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.90	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between AMUN and SCMB is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AMUN vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than SCMB's 3.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.14%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.38%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Drawdowns

AMUN vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUN	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-6.13%	+5.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-2.42%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-1.32%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMUN	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12%	4.15%	-3.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.12%	4.22%	-3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.12%	4.22%	-3.10%