AMUN vs. PIT

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Their -0.15 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AMUN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

AMUN vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 36.13% return.

AMUN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 1.24%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PIT

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 6.90%
• 6M: 22.74%
• YTD: 36.13%
• 1Y: 52.55%
• 3Y*: 18.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	$20.51K	$41.78K	$66.52K
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	$1.11M	$2.67M	$3.75M

AMUN vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.55%	0.14%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	36.13%	4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUN and PIT is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

AMUN vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 81
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMUN vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMUN	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.35	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.07	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.28	—

Drawdowns

AMUN vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUN	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-17.20%	+16.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.09%	+8.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.07%	-4.28%	+4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMUN	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94%	22.48%	-21.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.94%	17.75%	-16.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.94%	17.75%	-16.81%

AMUN vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUN vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than PIT's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	2.38%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.55%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUN and PIT in my portfolio?

AMUN and PIT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMUN or PIT?

On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUN or PIT?

AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUN or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 2.38% for AMUN.

What is the main difference between AMUN and PIT?

AMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 0.55% for PIT.