AMUB vs. AMND
AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) and AMND (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index, while AMND is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMUB charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMND.
Performance
AMUB vs. AMND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMUB
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
AMND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMUB vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 17.24% | 2.05% | 15.68% | 16.89% | 21.91% | 28.83% | 8.29% |
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.42% | 13.60% | 21.27% | 34.91% | 10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMUB and AMND is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between AMUB and AMND shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMUB vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank
AMUB
AMND
AMUB vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMUB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMUB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AMUB vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMUB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.94% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.23% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility
AMUB vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMUB | AMND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.24% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.09% | — | — |
AMUB vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMUB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMUB vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMUB nor AMND has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMND ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.14% | 6.56% | 6.37% | 7.10% | 2.49% |
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMUB and AMND have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.
AMUB and AMND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AMUB is categorized as MLPs, while AMND is Energy Equities. AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index, while AMND tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for AMUB and 0.75% for AMND.
Find the right allocation for AMUB and AMND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer