PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUB vs. AMND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUB vs. AMND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMUB

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
17.24%
6M
16.74%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
3.08%

AMND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUB vs. AMND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMUB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B
17.24%2.05%15.68%16.89%21.91%28.83%8.29%
AMND
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050
0.00%0.00%40.42%13.60%21.27%34.91%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUB and AMND is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020

0.80

The correlation between AMUB and AMND shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUB vs. AMND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUB
AMUB Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMND
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUB vs. AMND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050 (AMND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMUBAMNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.17

AMUB vs. AMND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMUBAMNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

Drawdowns

AMUB vs. AMND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUBAMNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

Volatility

AMUB vs. AMND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUBAMNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.09%

AMUB vs. AMND - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AMND's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUB vs. AMND - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMUB nor AMND has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AMND
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy High Dividend Index ETN due July 19, 2050
0.00%0.00%5.14%6.56%6.37%7.10%2.49%
AMUB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMUB and AMND have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMND is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMND is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.

AMUB and AMND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AMUB is categorized as MLPs, while AMND is Energy Equities. AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index, while AMND tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for AMUB and 0.75% for AMND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUB and AMND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer