AMTR vs. ANRJ.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while ANRJ.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMTR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.

Performance

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AMTR is traded in USD, while ANRJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANRJ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

AMTR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ANRJ.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 28.16%
• 6M: 29.28%
• 1Y: 67.68%
• 3Y*: 36.83%
• 5Y*: 27.60%
• 10Y*: 15.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.68%	12.75%	20.41%	36.99%	15.24%
ANRJ.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF	28.16%	54.07%	8.84%	15.58%	29.26%	25.37%	36.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMTR and ANRJ.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020	0.46

The correlation between AMTR and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMTR	ANRJ.L
Basic Materials	0.0%	25.7%
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	44.4%
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Technology	0.0%	1.4%
Utilities	0.0%	20.6%

Return for Risk

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANRJ.L

ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMTR	ANRJ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.40	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AMTR	ANRJ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-61.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.35%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.97%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMTR	ANRJ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.86%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	23.64%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	26.52%	—

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMTR vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMTR nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMTR and ANRJ.L in my portfolio?

AMTR and ANRJ.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMTR or ANRJ.L?

On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMTR or ANRJ.L?

ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMTR.

What is the main difference between AMTR and ANRJ.L?

AMTR is categorized as MLPs, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMTR and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.