AMTR vs. AMNA
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).
AMTR and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMTR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both AMTR and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMTR or AMNA.
Correlation
The correlation between AMTR and AMNA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMTR vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AMTR:
3.62
AMNA:
3.73
AMTR:
5.03
AMNA:
5.15
AMTR:
1.67
AMNA:
1.69
AMTR:
9.35
AMNA:
9.32
AMTR:
33.97
AMNA:
33.60
AMTR:
1.44%
AMNA:
1.44%
AMTR:
13.51%
AMNA:
12.97%
AMTR:
-19.33%
AMNA:
-18.83%
AMTR:
-5.24%
AMNA:
-5.20%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMTR having a 44.69% return and AMNA slightly lower at 44.30%.
AMTR
44.69%
-2.94%
27.99%
44.98%
N/A
N/A
AMNA
44.30%
-2.93%
27.82%
44.59%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMTR vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMTR and AMNA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMTR vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMTR vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
AMTR vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMTR drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, roughly equal to the maximum AMNA drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMTR and AMNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMTR vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) at 5.37%. This indicates that AMTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.