AMTR vs. AMUB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both MLPs funds from UBS - AMTR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Index while AMUB tracks the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMTR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.

Performance

AMTR vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMTR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMUB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 16.97%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 15.77%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMTR vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.68%	12.75%	20.41%	36.99%	15.24%
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B	16.97%	2.05%	15.68%	16.89%	21.91%	28.83%	19.12%

Correlation

The correlation between AMTR and AMUB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020	0.77

The correlation between AMTR and AMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMTR vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUB

AMUB Risk / Return Rank: 31
AMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTR vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMTR	AMUB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.00	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AMTR	AMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-79.46%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.15%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMTR	AMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.24%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.09%	—

AMTR vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMTR vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMTR nor AMUB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMTR and AMUB in my portfolio?

AMTR and AMUB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMTR or AMUB?

On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMTR or AMUB?

AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMTR or AMUB?

AMTR and AMUB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMTR and AMUB?

AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMTR and 0.80% for AMUB.