PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMSC vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMSC vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than HGER's 23.17% return.


AMSC

1D
-3.26%
1M
-8.99%
6M
17.25%
YTD
24.95%
1Y
-8.20%
3Y*
75.08%
5Y*
17.38%
10Y*
14.23%

HGER

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.86%
6M
20.50%
YTD
23.17%
1Y
31.96%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMSC vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
24.95%16.85%121.10%202.72%-55.98%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
23.17%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AMSC and HGER is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMSC vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMSC vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMSCHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.35

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

2.39

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

8.73

-8.98

AMSC vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMSC Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMSC and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMSC vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSCHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-23.31%

-76.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.08%

-14.04%

-47.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.86%

-14.04%

-49.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.81%

-8.66%

-86.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.80%

-7.71%

-68.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.03%

3.83%

+34.20%

Volatility

AMSC vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.33% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 5.75%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSCHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.33%

5.75%

+16.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.94%

15.35%

+39.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.50%

17.37%

+68.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.45%

17.67%

+69.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.28%

17.67%

+61.61%

Dividends

AMSC vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.75%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMSC and HGER have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to HGER (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs HGER's -23.31%.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMSC and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer