AMRMX vs. VT
AMRMX (American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - AMRMX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by American Funds, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, AMRMX returned 11.38%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMRMX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
AMRMX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMRMX achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AMRMX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.
AMRMX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
AMRMX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMRMX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A | 6.69% | 16.08% | 14.93% | 9.43% | -4.49% | 24.99% | 4.52% | 21.53% | -2.25% | 17.53% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMRMX and VT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.91 |
The correlation between AMRMX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMRMX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
AMRMX
VT
AMRMX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMRMX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.67 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 11.57 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMRMX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMRMX drawdown since its inception was -48.75%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMRMX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMRMX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.75% | -50.27% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -9.67% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | -16.51% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | -26.38% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.81% | -34.24% | +4.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.80% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -7.00% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.23% | -0.26% |
Volatility
AMRMX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A (AMRMX) is 2.74%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that AMRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMRMX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 5.65% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 11.32% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 13.58% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 16.19% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 17.20% | -3.06% |
AMRMX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMRMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMRMX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
AMRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMRMX American Funds American Mutual Fund Class A | 7.12% | 7.55% | 6.27% | 3.75% | 4.88% | 4.65% | 1.74% | 4.60% | 6.44% | 5.96% | 4.83% | 6.54% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMRMX and VT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to AMRMX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMRMX dropped -48.75% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMRMX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer