PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMPS.L is traded in GBp, while BNQP.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BNQP.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPS.L achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than BNQP.DE's 11.03% return.


AMPS.L

1D
-1.11%
1M
6.77%
YTD
16.22%
6M
21.23%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
10Y*

BNQP.DE

1D
-1.38%
1M
5.46%
YTD
11.03%
6M
21.07%
1Y
44.89%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
16.22%9.11%0.72%-28.10%0.71%
BNQP.DE
BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC
11.03%27.21%11.37%0.14%-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPS.L and BNQP.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022

0.64

The correlation between AMPS.L and BNQP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BNQP.DE
BNQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMPS.LBNQP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

4.90

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

18.04

-7.27

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the BNQP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPS.L and BNQP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMPS.LBNQP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.38

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.62

-0.72

Drawdowns

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.07%, which is greater than BNQP.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPS.L and BNQP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPS.LBNQP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.07%

-27.69%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-9.04%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-18.01%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.77%

-2.15%

-8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-8.38%

-15.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.46%

+0.74%

Volatility

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) is 4.18%, while BNPP RICI Kupfer (TR) Enhanced ETC (BNQP.DE) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that AMPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNQP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMPS.LBNQP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

5.67%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

14.94%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

18.60%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

18.84%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.49%

18.81%

+0.68%

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMPS.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BNQP.DE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMPS.L vs. BNQP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMPS.L nor BNQP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMPS.L and BNQP.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMPS.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMPS.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNQP.DE.

AMPS.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity, while BNQP.DE tracks RICI Enhanced Copper. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMPS.L and 1.00% for BNQP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMPS.L and BNQP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer