AMPH vs. SBUX
AMPH (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and SBUX (Starbucks Corporation) are both stocks. AMPH operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while SBUX operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AMPH returned 2.48%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for SBUX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMPH vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMPH achieves a -24.98% return, which is significantly lower than SBUX's 23.87% return. Over the past 10 years, AMPH has underperformed SBUX with an annualized return of 2.48%, while SBUX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
AMPH
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -24.98%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -22.19%
- 3Y*
- -24.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
SBUX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 22.22%
- 1Y
- 13.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
AMPH vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPH Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -24.98% | -27.88% | -39.97% | 120.74% | 20.31% | 15.81% | 4.25% | -3.07% | 3.43% | 4.45% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 23.87% | -5.26% | -2.48% | -1.19% | -13.18% | 11.15% | 24.19% | 39.09% | 14.74% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMPH and SBUX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2014 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
AMPH:
$933.34M
SBUX:
$117.80B
AMPH:
$1.67
SBUX:
$1.31
AMPH:
12.01
SBUX:
78.64
AMPH:
1.32
SBUX:
3.06
AMPH:
$720.53M
SBUX:
$38.46B
AMPH:
$341.13M
SBUX:
$12.24B
AMPH:
$155.96M
SBUX:
$5.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMPH vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank
AMPH
SBUX
AMPH vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMPH | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.66 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 1.45 | -2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMPH vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMPH drawdown since its inception was -74.05%, smaller than the maximum SBUX drawdown of -81.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPH and SBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMPH | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.05% | -81.91% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.25% | -18.53% | -26.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.05% | -31.97% | -42.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.05% | -43.68% | -30.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.05% | -43.68% | -30.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.09% | -8.15% | -60.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -16.24% | -7.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.54% | 8.37% | +14.17% |
Volatility
AMPH vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) at 7.26%. This indicates that AMPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMPH | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 7.26% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.17% | 21.10% | +25.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.78% | 28.48% | +25.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.07% | 31.68% | +13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.71% | 29.47% | +13.24% |
Dividends
AMPH vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison
AMPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPH Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.40% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Financials
AMPH vs. SBUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Starbucks Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMPH vs. SBUX - Profitability Comparison
AMPH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 70.32M and revenue of 171.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.32B and revenue of 9.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.3%.
AMPH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.63M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 828.10M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
AMPH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 6.42M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 510.90M and revenue of 9.53B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMPH and SBUX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMPH has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to SBUX (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPH dropped -74.05% vs SBUX's -81.91%.
SBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMPH and SBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer