PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPH vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMPH vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) and Mastercard Inc (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPH achieves a -32.34% return, which is significantly lower than MA's -17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AMPH has underperformed MA with an annualized return of 1.39%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.95% annualized return.


AMPH

1D
-1.79%
1M
-20.32%
YTD
-32.34%
6M
-34.30%
1Y
-30.33%
3Y*
-27.06%
5Y*
-0.72%
10Y*
1.39%

MA

1D
-1.28%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
-17.13%
6M
-14.57%
1Y
-18.49%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
17.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPH vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-32.34%-27.88%-39.97%120.74%20.31%15.81%4.25%-3.07%3.43%4.45%
MA
Mastercard Inc
-17.13%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPH and MA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2014

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMPH:

$841.82M

MA:

$421.09B

EPS

AMPH:

$1.67

MA:

$17.28

PE Ratio

AMPH:

10.83

MA:

27.30

PEG Ratio

AMPH:

0.57

MA:

1.59

PS Ratio

AMPH:

1.19

MA:

12.52

PB Ratio

AMPH:

1.09

MA:

62.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMPH:

$720.53M

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMPH:

$341.13M

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMPH:

$155.96M

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMPH vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPH
AMPH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AMPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPH vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMPHMADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

-0.84

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.51

-1.07

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.87

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.89

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-1.84

+0.45

AMPH vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPH and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMPHMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

-0.84

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.24

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.67

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.83

-0.68

Drawdowns

AMPH vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPH drawdown since its inception was -74.05%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPH and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPHMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.05%

-62.67%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.25%

-20.91%

-24.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.05%

-20.91%

-53.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.05%

-28.25%

-45.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.05%

-41.00%

-33.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.12%

-20.91%

-51.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.98%

-9.82%

-14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.90%

10.06%

+11.84%

Volatility

AMPH vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMPH) has a higher volatility of 26.71% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 5.95%. This indicates that AMPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMPHMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.71%

5.95%

+20.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.74%

17.27%

+28.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.42%

22.03%

+31.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.99%

23.96%

+21.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.65%

26.91%

+15.74%

Dividends

AMPH vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

AMPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMPH
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.69%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%

Financials

AMPH vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
171.17M
8.40B
(AMPH) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMPH vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mastercard Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
41.1%
58.4%
Portfolio components
AMPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 70.32M and revenue of 171.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Inc reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

AMPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.63M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Inc reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

AMPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 6.42M and revenue of 171.17M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Inc reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMPH and MA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMPH has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to MA (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMPH dropped -74.05% vs MA's -62.67%.

AMPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMPH and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer