PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLX vs. GBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLX vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLX achieves a 35.51% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 1.57% return.


AMLX

1D
0.55%
1M
20.54%
YTD
35.51%
6M
32.98%
1Y
226.10%
3Y*
-10.79%
5Y*
10Y*

GBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.66%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLX vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMLX
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
35.51%219.58%-74.32%-60.16%75.95%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
1.57%4.12%5.24%4.91%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLX and GBIL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLX vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLX
AMLX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GBIL
GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLX vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLXGBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-100.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

42.59

-41.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.44

191.21

-183.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.93

1,621.11

-1,605.19

AMLX vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLX and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLX vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLX drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLX and GBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLXGBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.04%

-0.76%

-95.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.61%

-0.02%

-30.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.09%

-0.76%

-92.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.00%

0.00%

-60.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.40%

-0.04%

-59.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.27%

0.00%

+14.27%

Volatility

AMLX vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that AMLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLXGBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.37%

0.05%

+16.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.21%

0.14%

+43.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.26%

0.23%

+67.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.43%

0.58%

+90.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.43%

0.47%

+90.96%

Dividends

AMLX vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

AMLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMLX
Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
3.74%4.02%4.93%4.77%1.37%0.00%0.81%2.20%1.70%0.74%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLX and GBIL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLX has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to GBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLX dropped -96.04% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.78 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLX and GBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer