AMLP vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMLP returned 14.76% vs -40.63% for IBIT. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

AMLP vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.

AMLP

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 15.29%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 14.76%
• 3Y*: 20.22%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 6.92%

IBIT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -20.12%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -40.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	15.29%	5.78%	21.76%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.41%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and IBIT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.16

The correlation between AMLP and IBIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMLP vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 38
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 39

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMLP	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.92	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	-1.30	+3.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.85	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	-0.78	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	-1.37	+6.73

AMLP vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMLP	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.19%	-52.11%	-25.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-52.11%	+43.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-49.45%	+44.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.37%	-16.53%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	29.64%	-26.87%

Volatility

AMLP vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.71%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMLP	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	12.07%	-7.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	34.45%	-25.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	44.10%	-32.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.95%	50.26%	-30.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.67%	50.26%	-22.59%

AMLP vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMLP vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.71%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMLP and IBIT in my portfolio?

AMLP and IBIT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMLP or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, AMLP or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, AMLP leads with 14.76% vs -40.63% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMLP or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 14.76% return vs -40.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMLP or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMLP or IBIT?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between AMLP and IBIT?

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.