PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. EQL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMLP vs. EQL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMLP vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
14.20%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
2.94%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than EQL's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed EQL with an annualized return of 8.63%, while EQL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
14.20%
6M
16.89%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
8.63%

EQL

1D
1.81%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
2.94%
6M
4.25%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMLP vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMLPEQLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.03

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

1.50

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.36

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.72

6.74

-5.01

AMLP vs. EQL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the EQL Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and EQL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMLPEQLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.03

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.73

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.74

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.83

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and EQL is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMLP vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than EQL's 1.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.54%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.71%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than EQL's maximum drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and EQL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPEQLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-35.65%

-41.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.27%

-11.90%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-19.24%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-35.65%

-36.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-4.49%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-3.28%

-14.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

2.40%

+3.20%

Volatility

AMLP vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 2.92%, while Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMLPEQLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.95%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

7.32%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

14.88%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

14.60%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

16.55%

+11.29%