PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. CP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. CP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly lower than CP's 22.60% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed CP with an annualized return of 6.92%, while CP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.35%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
6.92%

CP

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
22.60%
6M
20.36%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. CP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
15.29%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
CP
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
22.60%2.60%-7.84%6.85%4.71%4.64%37.33%45.04%-1.81%29.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and CP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and CP has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. CP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CP
CP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. CP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLPCPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.11

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

0.74

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

1.41

+3.94

AMLP vs. CP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CP Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and CP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. CP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than CP's maximum drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and CP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPCPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-69.17%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-16.23%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-25.88%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-25.88%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-33.70%

-38.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-1.29%

-3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-20.29%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

8.50%

-5.73%

Volatility

AMLP vs. CP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.71%, while Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPCPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

5.88%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

17.25%

-8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

22.48%

-10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

24.45%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

25.60%

+2.07%

Dividends

AMLP vs. CP - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than CP's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.71%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
CP
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
0.74%0.86%0.76%0.78%0.96%0.84%0.76%0.93%1.07%0.92%0.98%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and CP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CP has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs CP's -69.17%.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and CP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer