PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. AMJB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMLP vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMLP vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
14.20%5.78%16.70%
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
17.28%7.91%17.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMJB's 17.28% return.


AMLP

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
14.20%
6M
16.89%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
8.63%

AMJB

1D
-1.43%
1M
1.59%
YTD
17.28%
6M
20.78%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMLP vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AMJB
AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMLPAMJBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.67

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

0.99

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

0.76

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.72

2.01

-0.29

AMLP vs. AMJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the AMJB Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and AMJB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMLPAMJBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.67

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.15

-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and AMJB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMLP vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than AMJB's 5.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.54%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
5.71%6.52%5.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than AMJB's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and AMJB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPAMJBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-16.98%

-60.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.27%

-16.98%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-3.00%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.57%

-3.71%

-13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

6.38%

-0.78%

Volatility

AMLP vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 2.92%, while Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMLPAMJBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.70%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

10.23%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

20.11%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

17.74%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.84%

17.74%

+10.10%