AML.L vs. RL
AML.L (Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc) and RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — AML.L in Auto Manufacturers, RL in Apparel Manufacturing. Over the past 5 years, AML.L returned -54.38%/yr vs 29.02%/yr for RL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AML.L vs. RL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AML.L is traded in GBp, while RL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AML.L achieves a -33.03% return, which is significantly lower than RL's 4.99% return.
AML.L
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -33.03%
- 6M
- -34.97%
- 1Y
- -47.68%
- 3Y*
- -45.82%
- 5Y*
- -54.38%
- 10Y*
- —
RL
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 45.90%
- 5Y*
- 29.02%
- 10Y*
- 17.87%
AML.L vs. RL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AML.L Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc | -33.03% | -40.38% | -52.75% | 46.45% | -88.61% | -32.65% | -80.68% | -57.52% | -35.60% |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 4.99% | 43.98% | 65.70% | 32.83% | 2.48% | 17.76% | -13.25% | 11.65% | -18.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AML.L and RL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
AML.L:
£429.47M
RL:
$22.84B
AML.L:
-£0.61
RL:
$15.08
AML.L:
0.23
RL:
2.82
AML.L:
1.36
RL:
8.04
AML.L:
£1.85B
RL:
$8.11B
AML.L:
£355.40M
RL:
$5.67B
AML.L:
£432.70M
RL:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AML.L vs. RL — Risk / Return Rank
AML.L
RL
AML.L vs. RL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AML.L | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.21 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.21 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 6.63 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AML.L | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.12 | -2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 | 0.81 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.29 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
AML.L vs. RL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AML.L drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than RL's maximum drawdown of -56.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AML.L and RL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AML.L | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -56.76% | -43.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.80% | -16.86% | -41.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.83% | -37.04% | -53.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.35% | -37.04% | -61.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -4.54% | -95.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.02% | -21.00% | -69.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.07% | 5.62% | +27.45% |
Volatility
AML.L vs. RL - Volatility Comparison
Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) has a higher volatility of 17.84% compared to Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) at 16.03%. This indicates that AML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AML.L | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.84% | 16.03% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.85% | 26.01% | +11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.86% | 33.32% | +18.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.63% | 35.99% | +33.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.13% | 38.22% | +39.91% |
Dividends
AML.L vs. RL - Dividend Comparison
AML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AML.L Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 1.00% | 1.01% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% |
Financials
AML.L vs. RL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc and Ralph Lauren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AML.L vs. RL - Profitability Comparison
AML.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 21.80M and revenue of 803.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.7%.
RL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
AML.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported an operating income of -67.70M and revenue of 803.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.4%.
RL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported an operating income of 156.80M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
AML.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc reported a net income of -344.40M and revenue of 803.30M, resulting in a net margin of -42.9%.
RL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a net income of 151.60M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AML.L and RL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AML.L and RL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer