AMJB vs. VOLT
AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. AMJB is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, AMJB returned 15.68% vs 65.79% for VOLT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMJB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.
Performance
AMJB vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 37.23% return.
AMJB
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOLT
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 34.70%
- 1Y
- 65.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMJB vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 17.69% | 1.36% | -3.78% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 37.23% | 25.92% | -8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMJB and VOLT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AMJB and VOLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMJB vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank
AMJB
VOLT
AMJB vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMJB | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.53 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 7.38 | -5.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 20.55 | -15.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMJB | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 3.25 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.49 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
AMJB vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and VOLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMJB | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -23.40% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -8.96% | -0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -4.12% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.17% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 3.21% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AMJB vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) is 5.66%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that AMJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMJB | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 7.84% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 17.12% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 20.39% | -5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 24.11% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 24.11% | -5.92% |
AMJB vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMJB vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison
AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMJB and VOLT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOLT has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to AMJB (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMJB dropped -17.70% vs VOLT's -23.40%.
On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 65.79% vs 15.68% for AMJB. On fees, VOLT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AMJB has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 65.79% return vs 15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOLT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.
VOLT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for AMJB and 0.75% for VOLT.
VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMJB and VOLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer