AMJB vs. PRXV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMJB is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index, while PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis. AMJB is passively managed, while PRXV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. AMJB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.

Performance

AMJB vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMJB

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: -8.99%
• YTD: 12.70%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRXV

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMJB vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	2.77%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AMJB and PRXV is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026	-0.11

Return for Risk

AMJB vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMJB

AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 22
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 25

PRXV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMJB vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMJB	PRXV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	—	—

Drawdowns

AMJB vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and PRXV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMJB	PRXV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-1.41%	-16.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.03%	-0.24%	-9.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	-0.41%	-4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMJB	PRXV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.98%	10.52%	+5.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	10.52%	+7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	10.52%	+7.83%

AMJB vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMJB vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMJB nor PRXV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMJB and PRXV in my portfolio?

AMJB and PRXV have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMJB or PRXV?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMJB or PRXV?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMJB or PRXV?

AMJB and PRXV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMJB and PRXV?

AMJB is categorized as Energy Equities, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for AMJB and 0.36% for PRXV.