AMJB vs. CRAK

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - AMJB tracks the Alerian MLP Index while CRAK tracks the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AMJB returned 21.11% vs 70.85% for CRAK. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMJB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

AMJB vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 24.51% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 47.28% return.

AMJB

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 8.13%
• 6M: 14.51%
• YTD: 24.51%
• 1Y: 21.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.31%

CRAK

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 16.39%
• 6M: 31.77%
• YTD: 47.28%
• 1Y: 70.85%
• 3Y*: 23.11%
• 5Y*: 19.01%
• 10Y*: 14.65%
• ALL TIME*: 12.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	$770.06K	$939.64K	$1.10M
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	$24.74M	$18.05M	$9.17M

AMJB vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	24.51%	1.36%	10.85%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	47.28%	39.11%	-14.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AMJB and CRAK is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

AMJB vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMJB

AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 47
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 95
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMJB vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMJB	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	3.39	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	4.31	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.55	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	5.01	-3.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	16.54	-11.54

AMJB vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMJB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMJB and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMJB vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMJB	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-58.80%	+41.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.80%	-13.59%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-1.04%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-12.39%	+7.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	4.11%	+0.08%

Volatility

AMJB vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) is 5.38%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that AMJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMJB	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	6.59%	-1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.20%	16.11%	-2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.51%	20.11%	-3.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	20.75%	-2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	22.24%	-3.88%

AMJB vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMJB vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.37%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMJB and CRAK in my portfolio?

AMJB and CRAK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMJB or CRAK?

CRAK has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to AMJB (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMJB dropped -17.70% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, AMJB or CRAK?

On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 70.85% vs 21.11% for AMJB. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, AMJB has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMJB or CRAK?

Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 70.85% return vs 21.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMJB or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMJB or CRAK?

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

What is the main difference between AMJB and CRAK?

AMJB tracks Alerian MLP Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for AMJB and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.