AMIGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
AMIGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 25, 2013. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMIGX Amana Growth Fund | -6.50% | 17.89% | 16.01% | 26.00% | -19.30% | 31.80% | 32.97% | 33.43% | 2.70% | -0.66% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMIGX achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
AMIGX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -6.50%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- 20.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.59%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMIGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMIGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
AMIGX
SWLGX
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMIGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.66 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.10 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.72 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 2.51 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMIGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.66 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.68 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMIGX and SWLGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
AMIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMIGX Amana Growth Fund | 0.20% | 0.19% | 4.02% | 0.82% | 3.88% | 0.74% | 5.42% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 11.11% | 13.79% | 7.61% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMIGX drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMIGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMIGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -32.69% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -16.16% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.95% | -32.69% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -16.16% | +5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -7.13% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.62% | -1.82% |
Volatility
AMIGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that AMIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMIGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 5.38% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 11.82% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 22.31% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 21.47% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 22.78% | -4.50% |