PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMID vs. FCUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMID vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMID vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
-4.14%-1.39%13.06%31.26%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
14.56%13.69%30.59%21.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 14.56% return.


AMID

1D
2.78%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
-4.14%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
10Y*

FCUS

1D
5.33%
1M
-8.18%
YTD
14.56%
6M
17.93%
1Y
63.71%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMID vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMID vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID
AMID Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMIDFCUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.12

1.84

-1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.33

2.22

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.32

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.51

-3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.79

11.65

-10.87

AMID vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the FCUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMID and FCUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMIDFCUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

1.84

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.84

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and FCUS is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMID vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FCUS's 3.78% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
0.37%0.36%0.33%0.43%0.25%
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
3.78%4.33%11.19%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMID vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and FCUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMIDFCUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.32%

-39.89%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-17.70%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.93%

-9.72%

-4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-7.83%

+1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

5.34%

-1.62%

Volatility

AMID vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is 6.22%, while Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that AMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMIDFCUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

16.58%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

29.46%

-17.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.90%

34.85%

-14.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

30.06%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

30.06%

-10.87%