AMID vs. BBHM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. AMID is actively managed, while BBHM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BBHM.

Performance

AMID vs. BBHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than BBHM's 3.11% return.

AMID

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHM

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMID vs. BBHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	6.47%	-0.03%
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	3.11%	0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and BBHM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

AMID vs. BBHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. BBHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMID	BBHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	—	—

Drawdowns

AMID vs. BBHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than BBHM's maximum drawdown of -9.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and BBHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMID	BBHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-9.78%	-13.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.40%	-4.05%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-2.97%	-3.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMID	BBHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	18.20%	-1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.13%	18.20%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	18.20%	+0.93%

AMID vs. BBHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHM's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMID vs. BBHM - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.34%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMID and BBHM in my portfolio?

AMID and BBHM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMID or BBHM?

On fees, AMID is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMID or BBHM?

AMID is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMID or BBHM?

AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between AMID and BBHM?

They also come from different issuers: Argent and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.81% for BBHM.