PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMHIX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMHIX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than GFFFX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AMHIX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 3.29%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.


AMHIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.71%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
3.29%

GFFFX

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.81%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.23%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%8.89%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.19%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AMHIX and GFFFX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

-0.06

The correlation between AMHIX and GFFFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMHIX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMHIXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.32

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

1.97

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

7.70

+3.02

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMHIX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMHIXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

1.79

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.63

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.81

+0.60

Drawdowns

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMHIX drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, smaller than the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMHIX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMHIXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-36.26%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-13.74%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-21.55%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-36.26%

+18.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

-36.26%

+18.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.32%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-5.57%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.51%

-2.73%

Volatility

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) is 1.10%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that AMHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMHIXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

3.67%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

11.66%

-9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

15.16%

-12.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

20.25%

-15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

19.69%

-15.16%

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMHIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMHIX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

AMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than GFFFX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.94%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMHIX and GFFFX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFFFX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to AMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMHIX dropped -21.74% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

AMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMHIX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer