PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMHIX vs. FLMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMHIX having a 2.43% return and FLMI slightly higher at 2.51%.


AMHIX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.83%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.91%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
3.22%

FLMI

1D
0.04%
1M
1.46%
YTD
2.51%
6M
2.72%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.43%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%1.54%
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
2.51%5.89%4.91%7.89%-10.23%4.06%6.11%6.71%0.29%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AMHIX and FLMI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2017

0.59

The correlation between AMHIX and FLMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMHIX vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMI
FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMHIXFLMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.62

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.77

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

9.97

+0.37

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMHIX and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMHIX drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMHIX and FLMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMHIXFLMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-14.66%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.90%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

-5.31%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.81%

-14.66%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-2.81%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.80%

-0.02%

Volatility

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 0.66%. This indicates that AMHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMHIXFLMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

0.66%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

2.06%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

2.94%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.43%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

4.71%

-0.18%

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMHIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMHIX vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

AMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, which matches FLMI's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
3.86%3.89%4.08%3.71%3.08%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMHIX and FLMI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMHIX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to FLMI (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMHIX dropped -21.74% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMHIX and FLMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer